Saturday, December 14, 2013

The Bigger Shame: Britney Spears's New Album Is Horrible or the Fact She's Wearing David Yurman in Promoting Said?

Check out my glorious jewelry.
Pay no attention to my criminally-bad music.

















So Britney Spears's new album Britney Jean, which critics have nigh universally panned, dropped on December 3. My question to you, dear reader, is this:

What's the bigger shame: that this album is a mess of filler and overproduced dreck or the fact that Brit Brit is donning DY in the promotion of said mess? At the end of the proverbial day, what is, to you, worse: the production of bad music or the cheapening of a stately luxury brand? 


Sound off; post a comment or shoot me an E-mail.

Oh, and just for kicks, here are a few more shots of B decked in Yurman.

Is she hawking bad music or fine jewelry? Answer: yes.


Does this Wheaton ring help to distract from the fact
the standard-cut of my album has only ten tracks
and the majority of them are immediately forgettable?

2 comments:

  1. While she's no Queen Bey, Work B**ch is an earworm and surely will be a club banger. That said, the rest is what you expect of Britney Jean. Personally I don't think her being bedazzled in DY will cheapen the brand at all and I am sure the publicity is welcome, especially around the holiday season, no?
    PS Dear Santa, one Pavé Pinky Ring with Cognac Diamonds in Gold, if you please. size 4.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Santa has received your request, Christie, but will be unable to fulfill as his gifting budget has taken a sudden hit. (Thanks for the cognac-diamond signet ring, St. Nick!) :-P

    ReplyDelete